STANCE AND ENGAGEMENT MARKERS IN NAIRALAND DISCUSSIONS ON IBRAHIM BADAMASI BABANGIDA’S AUTOBIOGRAPHY

Abstract

The publication of Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB), a former Nigerian military ruler (1985-1993), autobiography in 2025, an era where social media amplifies diverse viewpoints, has reignited debates about his legacy and political actions, prompting a reassessment of his contributions and shortcomings. These analyses and discussions on platforms like Nairaland provide valuable insights into how IBB’s portrayal aligns with or diverges from public sentiment. Adopting Hyland’s (2005) framework of stance and engagement markers to meticulously analyse twenty excerpts from vibrant discussions on Nairaland, a prominent online forum. The research delves into how users articulate their attitudes towards IBB and engage with one another, emphasising the linguistic strategies employed to express both support and criticism, particularly about the controversial annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. The findings reveal a striking polarisation in user responses: while some participants wield positive stance markers to defend IBB's political legacy robustly, others deploy negative markers to vehemently challenge his credibility and decisions. Furthermore, engagement markers are pivotal in facilitating interaction, inviting users to share personal anecdotes and counterarguments, thereby enriching the dialogue. This analysis not only underscores the intricate dynamics of narrative construction in digital spaces but also highlights the transformative role of online platforms in shaping public perceptions of political figures. Ultimately, this research aspires to deepen the understanding of how linguistic choices in online discussions reflect and influence societal attitudes towards democracy and leadership in Nigeria, offering critical insights into the interplay between language, identity, and political discourse.